On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 4:01 AM Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 1/2/20 5:29 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:14 AM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > For us, since we don't have the SUSE patches that make PreReq do > > things, the way we'd declare this with upstream RPM features would be: > > Please don't spread misinformation, openSUSE doesn't have patches to > make PreReq anyhow special. They merely undo the deprecation warning > that is issued on PreReq. With or without that, a PreReq will be > translated to Requires(pre,preun) to simulate what the original PreReq did. > Huh, for some reason I thought it also did something else... > > > > Requires: user(wwwrun) > > OrderWithRequires: user(wwwrun) > > I'm not sure how one is supposed to read the above, but certainly one > does NOT need both Requires and OrderWithRequires on the same thing in a > package. Requires(pre) might be in order because for user/group you > really want them installed first in case of loops, but this is details > without OtherWithRequires makes it so that if it's in the same transaction, it'll get installed before this package. Otherwise it doesn't matter, yes. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
