Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Adopting sysusers.d format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/2/20 5:29 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:14 AM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For us, since we don't have the SUSE patches that make PreReq do
things, the way we'd declare this with upstream RPM features would be:

Please don't spread misinformation, openSUSE doesn't have patches to make PreReq anyhow special. They merely undo the deprecation warning that is issued on PreReq. With or without that, a PreReq will be translated to Requires(pre,preun) to simulate what the original PreReq did.


Requires: user(wwwrun)
OrderWithRequires: user(wwwrun)

I'm not sure how one is supposed to read the above, but certainly one does NOT need both Requires and OrderWithRequires on the same thing in a package. Requires(pre) might be in order because for user/group you really want them installed first in case of loops, but this is details without

	- Panu -
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux