Re: peek package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> The `peek` package has been approved in Fedora repositories [1], but it 
> doesn't even start without ffmpeg installed [2], which is not 
> distributed in Fedora repositories (but is available in rpmfusion):

Why we should drop such useful app just because it doesn't work on Cinnamon? It works on GNOME without ffpmeg and rpm fusion repo, see screenshot [1].

> The peek specfile contains a `Recommends: ffmpeg >= 3`, which is rather 
> confusing... I think this package should never have passed the review 
> process! It should really stay in rpmfusion repository.

OK, this should been fixed. There was a proposal for this but it not passed
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/914

> Is this something allowed? Should I file a ticket against the package or 
> against fedora-infra to suggest its retirement?

App works on GNOME. I can add hard dependency: gnome-shell in this case if you think this is better rather then installing ffmpeg.

[1] https://i.imgur.com/V5rSBiP.png
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux