On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:04 PM Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 13:13 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> It's also important to understand the current state of optical media
> release criteria. We've dropped the blocker requirement for most
> installation media two years ago. Only Everything netinst and Workstation
> Live remained. This proposal suggests that we drop these last two as well.
> If you're concerned about Server DVD or KDE Live or something else - there
> is no change for you.
As per my mail earlier in the thread, I'd suggest this is inaccurate.
Back at the time we reduced the set of tested images, the idea was
explicitly that we can test just *one* live image and just *one*
installer image as 'representatives' of the others. If one live image
boots, we can be fairly sure all live images boot. If one installer
image boots, we can be fairly sure all installer images boot. This is
because all lives are built identically so far as boot stuff goes, as
are all installer images.
This is *specifically* the idea we sold that change on, so it's kinda
logically invalid to then try and sell *this* Change on "well we only
test these two images ANYWAY so if you don't use them you shouldn't
care". It'd be trying to have things two opposite ways.
Fair point, that was an invalid argument from my side. Even though e.g. Server DVD hasn't been optical-blocking for some time, it still gained the benefits of test coverage or fixes in other media which were optical-blocking.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
