Once upon a time, John M. Harris Jr <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > This change is about testing those ISO images, and whether or not those ISO > images are release-blocking. If it's not a valid CD image (meaning it wouldn't > boot when put into a real disk drive), it most likely wouldn't work in the > virtual CD images. No, it is just about not writing those ISO images to physical media for testing. The ISO images will still be blocking deliverables. Testing of ISOs is easy and can be done automated. Testing of physical media requires time. > This also doesn't solve anything for the users > that have first or second generation UEFI systems, or those with UEFI firmware > provided by a vendor, that doesn't support USB boot. So again, if UEFI boot doesn't work, don't use it? I tried UEFI boot with an early generation, and it had multiple issues, so I stuck with BIOS boot for a while longer. There's nothing in Fedora that requires UEFI boot. > Instead of trying to attack CD/DVD installs, why not keep what's working in > the state it's already in? Because it's a time-consuming and manual process, and resources are limited? -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
