On Sunday, December 15, 2019 12:29:18 PM MST Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 7:52 PM John M. Harris Jr <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > Not working means broken. > > Part of this proposal is removing optical media from supported installation > methods. That was not brought up elsewhere in this thread. Who is considering this, and why? That would mean that a large portion of users would *not be able to install Fedora*. > From your point of view, Fedora is broken right now because, for example, > it doesn't work from USB Media created by UNetbootin most of the time. UNetbootin has never been a supported method of creating USB media. > It'll be the same, optical media will get delisted from supported > installation methods, so Fedora wouldn't be broken if it doesn't work from > installation source created using an unsupported method/media . .... Or, if > you don't agree with that, then it's already broken ;) Optical media is a supported installation method. -- John M. Harris, Jr. Splentity _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
