On Sat, 2019-12-14 at 14:25 +0000, Justin W. Flory wrote: > Hi all, > > I was surprised to see this Change be proposed without engagement > with the Fedora Mindshare Committee or reaching out to the advocacy / > user communities for more feedback. There are a lot of people this > Change could impact and I am concerned many of those voices are not > represented in this discussion or on this list. > > Is there any data or supporting evidence to support back this Change? > Other than private RH BZ customer tickets? I am really curious to > know the "why" behind this Change other than eliminating an > admittedly tedious task for the QA team to perform. I am thinking > about this from two points-of-view: There is no "why" behind this Change "other than eliminating an admittedly tedious task for the QA team". That's the whole thing. There aren't any "private RH BZ customer tickets". Why would RH customers care about whether or not Fedora blocks on physical optical media booting? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
