Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10. 12. 19 4:33, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 18:03 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 06. 12. 19 1:46, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,

How I produce the results of orphans-2019-12-02.txt ? or please
could
you update and upload orphans-2019-12-06.txt to see what we still
need
for js-jquery , etc.

https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt is generated and
uploaded in an
endless loop.

Great, I took js-jquery-file-upload  .

Running [1] we see that batik and pdfbox break more than 400 packages
each , someone should take it .
I'm testing if they build on rawhide right now.

I don't agree somebody should take them.

I think appstream should loose the build dependency on publican. Vast majority of the packages are in the report because of that.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773385

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux