Re: Heads up: rdma-core dropped support for 32-bit arm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 02:40:29PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 09 December 2019 at 14:15, Honggang LI wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:17:43PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> [...]
> > > The change to rdma-core.spec in commit b631ce466538bdee6e19be3286fb8cbeb5c73de6:
> > > ...
> > > +# 32-bit arm is missing required arch-specific memory barriers,
> > > +ExcludeArch: %{arm}
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > should have been communicated to all depdent package maintainers in
> > > advance, as this is effectively removing the package for armv7hl from
> > > rawhide. Cc'ing the committer.
> > > 
> > > Why was this built on arm32 before if RDMA is not supported on arm32?
> > 
> > We did not intentionally built rdma stack package for arm32.
> 
> You did not intentially disable building on arm32. All Fedora packages
> are built on all arches unless explicitly disabled:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_architecture_support
> 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484155
> > 
> > Please see this bug for details. The first version of rdma-core-12
> > did not built on arm32. Unfortunately, rdma-core-16.2-1.fc28 had been
> > built on arm32. It seems enabled by the fedora package building system
> > by default. I do not mean to blame fedora package building system. It is
> > our fault did not fix this time, when rdma-core-16.2-1.fc28 built on
> > arm32.
> 
> Thanks for the background. I'm not questioning your decision to stop
> building rdma for armv7hl, but it needs to be coordinated with the
> dependent packages. Please re-enable it, work with the respective

It seems not a good choice for me to re-enable and disable it again.

I'm trying to get an arm32 machine in our lab. And then I will narrow
down all packages impacted by this. Will open bug for all impacted
packages.

> maintainers to disable rdma support on armv7hl and then put ExcludeArch
> for armv7hl back in.
> 
> Regards,
> Dominik
> -- 
> Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPM Fusion  http://rpmfusion.org
> There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
> oppression to develop psychic muscles.
>         -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux