On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 16:37:09 +0000 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 7 Dec 2019, 14:46 Justin Forbes, <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 5:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones > > <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> > >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39456403 > >> > >> DEBUG util.py:596: No matching package to install: 'kernel' > >> > >> I can see that ppc64le was temporarily added to nobuildarches in > >> kernel.spec, and then removed. However there is no explanation in > >> git, and there was no successful build since then. > >> > >> What I also don't understand is why the older or F31 ppc64le kernel > >> package isn't inherited into the buildroot on ppc64le. > >> > >> > >> PPC64 LE has a buiid issue due to the netfilter offload changes > > upstream. It has been reported, a patch attempt was made, but ruled > > incorrect, and the maintainer hasn't corrected one. In the > > meantime, I felt it was worthwhile to have a testable build for the > > merge window. We have done this from time to time wit other arches > > that do not build in rawhide for short periods of time. It was one > > of the advantages of having kernel-headers split out. I expect a > > PPC64LE return soon. > > > > Would it be an option to temporarily disable that netfilter offload > option for ppc64le to get around that issue instead? +1 for a temporary config change Justin, do you have an upstream link/pointer for the build issue? Dan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
