On Sat, 7 Dec 2019, 14:46 Justin Forbes, <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 5:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39456403
DEBUG util.py:596: No matching package to install: 'kernel'
I can see that ppc64le was temporarily added to nobuildarches in
kernel.spec, and then removed. However there is no explanation in
git, and there was no successful build since then.
What I also don't understand is why the older or F31 ppc64le kernel
package isn't inherited into the buildroot on ppc64le.
PPC64 LE has a buiid issue due to the netfilter offload changes upstream. It has been reported, a patch attempt was made, but ruled incorrect, and the maintainer hasn't corrected one. In the meantime, I felt it was worthwhile to have a testable build for the merge window. We have done this from time to time wit other arches that do not build in rawhide for short periods of time. It was one of the advantages of having kernel-headers split out. I expect a PPC64LE return soon.
Would it be an option to temporarily disable that netfilter offload option for ppc64le to get around that issue instead?
Peter
_______________________________________________Justin
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
