On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 17:40 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 12. 19 17:36, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Today I've attempted to run "dnf upgrade". > > > > It has the following in it: > > > > Upgrading: > > protobuf x86_64 3.6.1-6.module_f31+6793+1c93c38e updates-modular > > > > Enabling module streams: > > ant > > eclipse > > maven > > > > > > I don't consider this behavior adequate for a released Fedora version. > > > > As a maintainer of dependent packages (Cura stack) I have tested and built it > > against the nonmodular protobuf. What just happened here and how do I track it > > down? > > > > dnf doesn't even tell me what module is this in. I suppose eclipse. > > > > However, protobuf was not mentioned in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2285 > > More to it, the modular protobuf disables Python support in: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/c/69b7a51fd87239ebc71c3c2e27ec852a19b99e7b?branch=eclipse > > My packages explicitly require protobuf for Python support. This is breaking them. Probably caused by this: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-module-defaults/c/eced70a03ad4c97987b26655de64debc881c5cf4?branch=f31 That protobuf build is indeed in the eclipse module: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1398456 - note its tags are all 'module-eclipse-something'. Stephen? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
