On Fri, Dec 6, 2019, 08:46 Mattia Verga via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Il 06/12/19 07:34, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> I was recently bit by a bug, which was caused by a mismatch between texlive-biblatex and biber. The technical side is not so important, only so much that they need each other in a pretty specific version, which is not reflected on the rpm level.
> What I found weird is that you can't comment on an update, which is already pushed to stable. A lot of users are only hit by a bug, once it reaches stable and then you don't have any possibility to highlight a bug report or an issue with this update. I would like to have the possibility to add such an information to an update, which introduced the issue.
That was requested and discussed long time ago in
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/2050
The rationale behind this was about the nonsense to have users
commenting on an already pushed update, since this cannot be undone.
My opinion is that once an update is pushed to stable, new bugs should
be reported in Bugzilla, not as comments in Bodhi. However there's an
open discussion about restoring the previous behavior:
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3748
> Also I would like to ask if it is possible for important updates, like the texlive one to increase the stable karma. It really depends which mirrors you are using and if you are unlucky the updates get pushed to stable, before it reaches updates-testing for you and then again there's nothing to add, once it's pushed.
>
The stable-karma and stable-days parameters can be set by the user in
the web form or by CLI. By default stable-karma is set to 3, but it can
be changed when creating the update.
Right. So should the default of -3/+3 be changed for "critpath" packages? They already need 14 days in testing, but they also get orders of magnitude more feedback, so raising the karma limits to -2/+6 or something like that sounds reasonable to me.
On the other hand, I wouldn't even have any objections to changing the defaults to something like -2/+6 for all packages, since it wouldn't make any difference at all for the majority of packages that reach 7 days in testing without any feedback whatsoever.
Fabio
Mattia
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
