On 2019-12-02, John M. Harris Jr <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday, December 2, 2019 12:17:20 AM MST Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> Sure, we just have to accept this until perl is made >> parallel-installable. Which may or may not happen, but if I have >> choice between "only one version of perl and no bugzilla" or "two >> conflicting versions of perl and bugzilla using non-default version >> of perl", I will choose latter. Unfortunately reality is not perfect. > > Doesn't that defeat the purpose of using a distro? At that point, you > might as well go grab some container nonsense, instead of using a real > system, if you care more for just "make it run", rather than "make it > run properly on a stable, supported Perl". > You assume that a non-default Perl is not stable and supported. While it's true that non-default streams have probably fewer users and thus are less tested, that does not mean it is an intention. -- Petr _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
