Re: Do we need a "No broken deps" Objective?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:40 PM Igor Gnatenko
<ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Last time I checked, it was basically checking only the first part of "with" richop. I believe it is still broken the same way.

No, it definitely checks both parts now. For example, the broken
dependency reported as
(crate(git2) >= 0.9.0 with crate(git2) < 0.10.0)
is unsatisfiable since the rust-git2-devel package in rawhide has
version 0.10.1 (and hence doesn't satisfy the second requirement).

Fabio

> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 17:33 Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 2:08 PM Igor Gnatenko
>> <ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey Fabio,
>>
>> (snip)
>>
>> > There is a problem with the code. You seem to run either repoquery or
>> > repoclosure inside. However, that does not really check rich
>> > dependencies correctly.
>>
>> To follow up on this: It turns out DNF's repoclosure *does* correctly
>> report broken dependencies, even for rich dependencies (or it's not as
>> broken as we thought).
>> Checking a random sample of the reported "broken rich dependencies"
>> manually, it turned out every single one I checked was *actually
>> unsatisfiable*, and not caused by a DNF / repoclosure bug.
>>
>> Fabio
>>
>> > Do you want to check for FTI/FTBFS or that all dependencies are
>> > present in Fedora?
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 1:23 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi everybody,
>> > >
>> > > I'm a bit concerned about the growing number of broken dependencies in
>> > > fedora, which leads to non-installable (FTI) and un-buildable (FTBFS)
>> > > packages. For rawhide [0], I see almost 400 source packages and almost
>> > > 200 x86_64 packages with broken deps. Especially the number of source
>> > > packages with broken dependencies has steadily been growing since 29.
>> > >
>> > > With a bit of effort, a lot of these broken packages could be fixed
>> > > quite easily, but it would still need a coordinated effort by a group
>> > > of people. I think an Objective would fit for that purpose.
>> > >
>> > > Fabio
>> > >
>> > > PS: Feel free to browse the data in the linked pagure repo. I'm
>> > > regenerating it daily with the latest state of all fedora branches. If
>> > > somebody is interested in getting notified about any of their packages
>> > > getting broken deps (for example, in -testing, before things get
>> > > broken in stable), I can work out some kind of automatic (opt-in)
>> > > notification system :)
>> > >
>> > > [0]: https://pagure.io/fedora-health-check/blob/master/f/reports/report-rawhide.md
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux