Re: Do we need a "No broken deps" Objective?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 11:27 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 2:08 PM Igor Gnatenko
> <ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Fabio,
>
> (snip)
>
> > There is a problem with the code. You seem to run either repoquery or
> > repoclosure inside. However, that does not really check rich
> > dependencies correctly.
>
> To follow up on this: It turns out DNF's repoclosure *does* correctly
> report broken dependencies, even for rich dependencies (or it's not as
> broken as we thought).
> Checking a random sample of the reported "broken rich dependencies"
> manually, it turned out every single one I checked was *actually
> unsatisfiable*, and not caused by a DNF / repoclosure bug.
>

If this is actually working now, then we could try seeing if
spam-o-matic[1] works now...

[1]: https://pagure.io/releng/blob/master/f/scripts/spam-o-matic


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux