Re: Is 50+ RPM Subpackages too extreme?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:25:25AM +0000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 10:45:00 +0000, Ian McInerney wrote:
> > Tex isn't really the best example for the insane package numbers (since the
> > main Tex system, CTAN, actually does define them as separate packages). It
> > would be interesting to know if anyone actually does just install one or two
> > rather than all... I know that I usually just install all of them on new
> > systems.
> 
> Oh, I almost never install the whole thing. I install whatever packages
> I need only, taking advantage of the great packaging work that the
> maintainers have put in.

Yeah, me too. I usually run latex/xelatex/whatever, read any errors,
and just do dnf install -y tex(foobar.sty) as needed. For a handful
of required imports this works fine.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux