Re: Is 50+ RPM Subpackages too extreme?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 2019-11-27 07:44, Igor Gnatenko a écrit :
No, 50 is perfectly fine. As others mentioned, we have much bigger
amount of them in texlive.

It's not just about the number of subpackages. Each package you publish will end up as a separate node in the dependency graph.

Since functional plugins tend to accumulate dependency links once published (things that need those plugins, and things the plugins need to work), splitting the plugins is a requirement to avoid unmanageable dependency hairballs.

The reason upstreams move to a plugin architecture, is precisely to isolate the requirements of each plugin from the requirements of the others

Regards,

--
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux