On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:53:55AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 20:41 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > This sounds more like fedora-packaging, or would you have a > > distinctive mark for the differences fedora-packaging vs > > fedora-maintainers (the former being a normal open list). Yes, there > > are too many lists at Fedora and making them closed or read-only does > > not help. > > Not exactly. Fedora-packaging was a list space tossed up to > discuss/create an authoritative packaging guideline for > Core/Extras/Legacy/etc.. OK, then I guess the discussion should have happened there and not fedora-maintainers. > Again, smaller the number of participants w/ stakes the faster > decisions can be made and implemented. Not all the maintainers are > interested in such discussion, so why add noise? A lot of > maintainers just want a guideline to be created, so they can follow > it. Different topics. > > Personally, I like that the lists for Fedora are being clearly > segregated. This allows me to keep better track of the subjects I > actually care about by subscribing only to those lists. Big general > lists mean that I have to sift through tons of email I care not about to > find (and usually miss) something I DO care about. > -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpTPQhTX2GSf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
