Re: Openness: Apache as a guiding model (was Re: GFS removed??? )

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:18:36AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 20:12 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > For one I fail to see any connection of the issues at hand (GFS kernel
> > modules) with extras, so forcing people to contribute to extras just
> > because they want to contribute to FC/RHEL seems to be very wrong.
> 
> Extras is the entry point to the Fedora Project.  Fedora Project is the
> entry point to RHEL.  Why is this so hard to understand?

So this list should be scraped? And GFS will make its reappearance in
Fedora Extras?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgppfUtB2BvTu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux