Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019-11-19, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, but what you have described is basically to create 2 streams of
> perl-Sys-Virt module. Which is probably not what normal people want.

Having two different perl-Sys-Virt packages was requesed by
Daniel. That was not my choice.

> Creating module for one package is the worst idea ever.
>
Matter of opinion.

> Sure, bundling perl-Sys-Virt into the libvirt module would solve the
> problem, but then what's the point of modules? You will be building
> libvirt itself then multiple times due to the stream expansion.
> 
Then put perl-Sys-Virt into a separat module.

And please to do not top-post.

-- Petr
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux