On Friday, November 15, 2019 6:32:21 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote: > Example: I have Perl 5.26 as a default version. I have Perl 5.30 as an > laternative version. Now I want to package Bugzilla that's written in > Perl. How do you package Bugzilla so that it works with Perl 5.26 as > well as with Perl 5.30? This sounds like a bug in Modularity. > If each of the Perls is a stream of a module, you will put Bugzilla into > a module and let it depend on any of the Perls. User can install any of > the Perls and Bugzilla. I'm guessing that Perl from a module doesn't meet a Require on perl? That's not a policy issue, nor an issue with traditional, non-modular, packages. > With your proposal Bugzilla packager would have to package Bugzilla > twice: as a normal package for default Perl 5.26 and as a module for Perl > 5.30. Then a user would have hard time to select the right combinations of > Perl and Bugzilla. It would double fork work pacakgers and and make > the system more dificult for users. I don't believe that's the case. The packager would choose how they want to handle it, most likely just not bothering with modules. The user would just `dnf install bugzilla`, and use the version that is packaged as a non-modular package. -- John M. Harris, Jr. Splentity _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
