Re: [fedora-java] What's the State of the Java SIG?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 18:40 -0500, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:37:39 +0100, you wrote:
> 
> > Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > Or is it time for a "tabula rasa" and restart the SIG?
> > 
> > IMHO, yes. Kick out the 1 or 2 Modularity fundamentalists that form
> > the 
> > current remains of the Java SIG and create a new Java SIG from
> > scratch that 
> > actually cares about packaging Java properly in and for (non-
> > modular) 
> > Fedora.
> 
> Great, you eliminate the remaining members of the Java SIG (those who
> didn't go running away because forcing Java stuff into RPMs was too
> painful).

As far as I understand those members want force users (java users) to
use modules 


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux