Re: [fedora-java] Re: What's the State of the Java SIG?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alex Scheel wrote:
> A number of these packages exist as ursine packages precisely because
> you've made them BUILDROOT-only! We, the Dogtag team, asked you to
> reconsider that choice because we needed these as runtime dependencies,
> not build-time only. You declined and said our choices were to maintain
> our own modular forks or maintain the ursine variety. So, here we are.
> And now, you're telling us to switch to modules? But that doesn't help
> us access those BUILDROOT-only packages at runtime!

This is exactly why I think buildroot-only packages need to be forbidden in 
Fedora.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux