On Friday, November 15, 2019 6:03:40 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote: > You answered yourself: "default modular streams are planned to deliver > the exact same experience as non-modular packages." If they provide the > same experience, they provide the same set of benefits. Hence there > cannot be any "benefits of default modular streams over non-modular > packages". Q.E.D. > > If you want a disuccion, then you should not have stripped all > modularity features and than ask what are the benefits of modularity > without modularity. I believe that was precisely Miro's point. If there are no inherent benefits to default modular streams, why should we have "default streams" instead of simply having non-modular packages? -- John M. Harris, Jr. Splentity _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
