> Well, it started as sqlite3, with good reason. Look: > > -rwxr-xr-x root root 29844 /usr/bin/sqlite3 > lrwxrwxrwx root root 19 /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so.0 > -rwxr-xr-x root root 316204 /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6 > -rw-r--r-- root root 52690 /usr/include/sqlite3.h > -rw-r--r-- root root 403624 /usr/lib/libsqlite3.a > -rwxr-xr-x root root 819 /usr/lib/libsqlite3.la > lrwxrwxrwx root root 19 /usr/lib/libsqlite3.so > -rw-r--r-- root root 231 /usr/lib/pkgconfig/sqlite3.pc > > Sure, the v2 sqlite package could be rename to sqlite0 or sqlite2 if it > will still be needed. But that's not the point. I asked for it to be changed from sqlite3 to sqlite b/c it made little sense to me that the package should be named sqlite3 when we weren't providing sqlite(any number) in the rest of the distro. add to that the the upstream package name is sqlite, not sqlite3 and I didn't see a compelling reason to have an odd ball virtual provide (and dep) for the package. -sv
