man, 14.03.2005 kl. 18.45 skrev Jeff Spaleta: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:25:28 +0100, Michael Schwendt > <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >I don't think so. Just for the record, SQLite 3.1.2 is the first stable > > version of the v3 series. > > yeah even upstreams 3.1.5 release seems to be affected according to to > some ongoing testing by some people on irc. Appearently there has been > a change in the allowed sql syntax. Considering that 3.1.x is suppose > to be backwards compatible with the 3.0.x series, this feels like an > upstream bug to me. Poking at the upstream bugzilla i see similar > issues regard some syntax regressions but not the exact problem being > experienced here. It could be a bug.. or it could be a configurable > syntax parsing rule issue. > > > Interestingly, the sqlite package now upgrades sqlite 2.8.16 from Fedora > > Extras. This creates a jump from libsqlite.so to libsqlite3.so and > > breaks ABI and API > > Yeah thats a little added wrinkle for sure, consider this a wonderful > multiversion test case for Fedora Extras packaging guidelines. > > -jef"names have been withheld to protect the innocent"spaleta Then who should provide the sqlite-compat? extras (it won't be compat for fc3)? base? Or maybe its time to consider naming it sqlite3 and sqlite2...
