Dne 04. 10. 19 v 21:31 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
1. (drastic for modular maintainers) We keep miantaining the default versions of things as ursine packages. We only modularize alternate versions.
This will improve current situation. And it will resolve upgrades from F30->F31. However, I fail to see how this generally resolve dep_enabled modules. And upgrades of modules in general. I.e,: Alice runs: dnf module install foo:1 Fedora N has only foo:1. Fedora N+1 has only foo:2 Alice cannot do: dnf module disable foo:1 dnf module enable foo:2 Because foo:2 is available only in Fedora N+1 and the baseurl is https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-modular-$releasever&arch=$basearch And she cannot do: dnf module disable foo:1 dnf system-upgrade because of broken deps in Fedora N+1 and module foo:1 (definitelly because of depenency on module_platform(platform:fN) -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
