Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Another benefit of this would be that the "*-modular" repositories
> could be disabled by default, which would eliminate a whole lot of
> upgrade issues for "normal users".
> Only people who *actually want* alternate versions would enable
> modules (and *-modular repos?), and they can then expected to know how
> to handle upgrade issues.

+1. I don't understand why Modularity was not implemented that way to begin 
with.

> I think that letting people drop ownership and maintenance of "normal
> packages" and *only* doing modules instead was a mistake. But that's
> just my opinion ;)

+1, not just yours. ;-)

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux