Re: Don't add default contents in `fedpkg request-branch` tickets Was: Re: can we merge package.cfg into master

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 10:47 AM Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Le jeu. 3 oct. 2019 à 21:40, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> >
> > On Friday, September 27, 2019 6:29:54 PM CEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 12:06 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:03 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > epel 8 brings a new file called package.cfg, I strongly prefer to
> > > > > keep
> > > > > branches mergeable with fast forward , may we merge this into
> > > > > master ?
> > > > > like I did in pngquant [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > It disables the normal build behavior for all non-master branches, so
> > > > you don't want to do that.
> > >
> > > Well , I want keep my branches mergeable !
> >
> > Same problem.  I came across several epel8 branch requests ... and there
> > always is some default 'package.cfg' file I don't really mind as I
> > observed (the builds against epel8 just succeed without that).  More,
> > sometimes the README.md is added.

I'm not sure about this, but I think without the package.cfg file,
builds won't be submitted to both epel8 and epel8-playground, but only
to epel8? This might not be what you want.

Fabio

> I've tried to report the issue here: (although it's for another use-case).
> https://pagure.io/fedpkg/issue/354
>
> Allowing to have the same package.cfg to describe the appropriate
> behaviour for all branches would be nice.
> But there is probably a need to improve the package.cfg format and
> associated behavior.
>
> > Could we stop doing that?  Unless it is really reasonable, I don't plan to
> > make differences in maintained branches, and to achieve that with the
> > current approach -- I have to go the ugly way (merge epel8 to master and
> > vice versa, so histories in all branches are ugly forever).
> I don't get why people use that, it doesn't solve the problem but make it worse.
> Best is to merge newer branches into olders and avoid any merge commit
> in master. (some projects forbid that).
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux