Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Better Thermal Management for the Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 5:51 AM Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How about we just reverse-engineer what those blobs do and reimplement them
as Free Software?

If I'm reading the comments right in the bugzilla report linked above, it sounds like Lenovo is going to do the right thing and put out an update BIOS for doing thermal management in the BIOS itself, rather than having the OS control it.  I realize that probably doesn't cover everyone's use cases (or maybe not even older-model Lenovo laptops), but at least for me, this sounds like a more sane approach than trying to guess/reverse engineer what the OS is supposed to tell the hardware.

-Jared
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux