Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:23:21AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 9/26/19 10:28 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Would this change if the PR was automatically tested for you without you having
> > to do anything?
> 
> I always run local mock builds prior to commits. Maybe not everyone likes to
> do this and wants Koji to do it for them, but I prefer local mock builds.
> Having it done for me is redundant. I don't think I would stop doing local
> mock builds.

There are more tests we can do than simply: does it build?
There is also the: Does it install? Does it upgrade? Does it uninstall?
Does the machine still boot after installing it?
Does it adhere to our packaging guidelines?

So, all of the work the CI SIG folks are trying to set up these days.

Pierre
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux