On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 04:46:32PM +0200, Ben Rosser wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 4:29 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There is a clear initial rejection of a PR-only contribution model. I hear that > > and that may mean that we never go this way. I'm honestly fine with that :) > > I do want to see why that is a show-stopper and if we can find ways to not have > > it be a show-stopper. > > > > When we work on upstream projects, I think it's pretty standard now to always go > > via PRs, even for your own branch. > > So that tests are run, so that other member of the community can see, comment, > > review the change. > > What is so different in Fedora that we cannot move to this model? > > Is it a tooling issue? > > Is it something else? > > Most packages in Fedora are effectively one-person projects (modulo > rebuild scripts and other automated tooling). My experience when > working on a personal project is that I don't use PRs for changes even > if I do develop a change in a branch, rather than master; it's a lot > of unnecessary overhead. There are no "other members" of the > community. No one is reviewing the change other than me. Would this change if the PR was automatically tested for you without you having to do anything? Thanks, Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
