On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > I'm quite certain that forbidding people to move to module-only would mean > > that we would not only not have a Java stack in Fedora but also no Java > > module too. > > I think that banning module-only packages would actually get Java back to > non-modular-only, since the goal of going module-only is clearly to only do > one rather than both. I don't see how maintaining the packages as module- > only is in any way less work than maintaining them as non-modular-only. So > we need to force the packagers to set the correct priorities for the benefit > of the project as a whole. To make things even more interesting, the non-modular Java stack has almost reached parity with what's available from the shiny module branches, except a handful of packages that require more work than a simple "bump version and build" (for example, the rebase from maven 3.5 to 3.6 is still pending, but I'm planning to work on that soon). Fabio > Kevin Kofler > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
