Re: Impact of dropping QEMU emulation on 32-bit hosts ? (~Fedora 33)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Jun Aruga wrote:
> > Does anyone know of, or have, any critical/important use cases that would
> be disrupted by QEMU dropping 32-bit *host* support ? If so, let me know
> here & I can forward feedback on. Or feel free to go direct to QEMU thread
> upstream.
> 
> I am not a real user of ARM 32-bit. I just checked information for ARM
> 32-bit (armv7) use cases.
> 
> ## Raspberry Pi
> 
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi
> > The earlier V1.1 model of the Raspberry Pi 2 used a Broadcom BCM2836 SoC with a 900 MHz 32-bit, quad-core ARM Cortex-A7 processor, with 256 KB shared L2 cache.
> >
> > https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/raspberry-pi-2-on-sale/
> 
> It seems that the version 1.1 is the last model for 32-bit, and the
> announcement was 5 August 2015.
> I assume a considerable number of people using ARM 32-bit Raspberry Pi.

Right, but I'm rather sceptical that people are running QEMU on the
32-bit RPi boards. I might be less surprised about the Linux userspace
emulation being used, vs full VM, since the former is lower overhead.


> ## Running Linux on smart phone device.
> 
> Some articles about it.
> 
> * https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2017/03/16/installing-linux-on-an-android-phone/
> * https://www.quora.com/How-can-I-install-Fedora-on-my-smartphone

Perhaps I'm wrong, but I got the impression most mid range & above Android
phones are now 64-bit ARM.

> > https://android.stackexchange.com/a/202022
> 
> ARMv7 (32-bit) was 98.1% in entire share of android hardware on March 2017.

I think things changed alot in smartphones over the last two years,
though admittedly my experiance is biased towards my part of the world.


> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-09/msg06216.html
> > Eventually this public don't need edge QEMU, it might keep using QEMU
> v5.0.stable until all NAS/embedded devices are 64-bit...
> 
> For example, how about releasing compat-qemu50 RPM if upstream will
> drop armv7 on qemu 6.x?
> It's like compat-openssl10 RPM for openssl (version 1.1) RPM.
> 
> Maybe if some RPM packages need armv7 support, they can use
> compat-qemu50 conditionally in the spec file.

I'd be pretty strongly against providing any outdated QEMU builds in
Fedora given the high frequency of security updates that need to be
dealt with.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux