Re: MPFR 4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I second this notion. As I recall, the only thing in the way of the
MPFR 4 update was a circular dependency on the libmpc package I
maintain, and allowing the userbase to catch up to the API change.

It's been a while now, and it would be nice to get this change rolling.

-- 

James Paul Turner
Department of Informatics
University of Sussex

Arpra: Arbitrary-Precision Range Analysis
https://github.com/arpra-project/arpra


On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 11:29 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:00 PM Pavel Cahyna <pcahyna@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:31:02AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > > I would like to ask again if anyone who works at RedHat can check
> > > on
> > > Pavel's status.  It would be good to know if he is not available
> > > until
> > > <DATE>, or if he is too busy to pay attention to mpfr.  Thank
> > > you.
> > 
> > Hi, sorry for the delayed reply. I will not be able to look into it
> > before Monday.
> 
> [Nearly 2 months later]
> 
> I need some advice on how to proceed.  I am ready to move the mpfr 4
> change forward, but the 2 lines above are the only communication I've
> ever had from the package owner.  There is already a change page
> here,
> which could be reused with some minor edits:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/mpfr-4.0.0
> 
> And that change page links to an existing releng issue where releng
> agreed that the only action required by them is management of a side
> tag:
> 
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7247
> 
> I would like to revive/hijack those to get this moving again.  What
> should I do about the maintainer, who is probably very busy with
> other
> work?  Since gcc uses mpfr, the package is a critical one for Fedora.
> If it is not inconsistent with RedHat's goals or policies, could I
> perhaps step into a comaintainer role for mpfr?
> 
> Since this thread is so old, I will repeat that I have done
> successful
> x86_64 mock builds of all dependent packages.  I've got the right
> sequence of builds all worked out and ready to go.  There may be
> problems on other arches; if so, I am ready to fix them.
> -- 
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux