Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 03:01:25PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 26/09/2019 à 11:36, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
> > Here is what the vision we came to and that we would like to discuss:
> > 
> > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests
> 
> IMHO Have to stay optional, making this mandatory being a terrible headache.

What makes it a headache? What can we do to not have this be a terrible
headache? Can we fix/improve the tooling?

Note: this is the long term vision, as we move towards it things will be
optional: opt-in, then (maybe) opt-out, then (if we want to) mandatory.


Thanks for your feedback :)
Pierre
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux