Hi Vit, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 24. 09. 19 v 17:47 Todd Zullinger napsal(a): >> These srpm's require asciidoctor or rubygems-asciidoctor: >> >> awesome >> booth >> hugo >> ipmctl >> js8call >> mod_auth_mellon >> nanomsg >> ndctl >> nng >> oidentd >> qpid-dispatch >> tuned >> usbguard >> weechat >> wiki2beamer >> wsjtx > > > Are you sure you have used correct query? Looking just for > rubygem-asciidoctor, this is an output of my query: > > hugo-0:0.55.6-1.fc31.src > js8call-0:1.1.0-2.fc31.src > mod_auth_mellon-0:0.14.2-2.fc31.src > nanomsg-0:1.1.5-2.fc31.src > ndctl-0:66-1.fc31.src > nng-0:1.1.1-3.fc31.src > oidentd-0:2.4.0-1.fc32.src > qpid-dispatch-0:1.8.0-3.fc32.src > rubygem-asciidoctor-doc-0:1.5.6.1-6.fc30.noarch > rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-0:1.5.0-0.10.alpha.18.fc31.noarch > rubygem-chake-0:0.17.1-3.fc31.src > rubygem-jekyll-asciidoc-0:3.0.0-1.fc32.noarch > rubygem-slim-0:3.0.9-4.fc31.src > rubygem-tilt-0:2.0.8-6.fc31.src > wiki2beamer-0:0.10.0-2.fc31.src > wsjtx-0:2.1.0-2.fc31.src Ahh, I see. I missed that some of the rubygem's use rubygem(asciidoctor) as the BuildRequires. That covers rubygem-chake, rubygem-slim, and rubygem-tilt. The rubygem-{asciidoctor-pdf,jekyll-asciidoc} packages don't BuildRequire asciidoctor, so my search wouldn't have picked them up. I only looked for BuildRequires. I'm sure others use asciidoctor at run time, but I only intended to directly bcc package owners who BuildRequire asciidoctor. FWIW, the query I used was: dnf repoquery -q --qf '%{name}' --archlist=src --releasever=rawhide \ --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source \ --whatrequires asciidoctor --whatrequires rubygem-asciidoctor I should have added --whatrequires 'rubygem(asciidoctor)' as well. I've added those rubygem package owners to Bcc to let them know asciidoctor-2.0.10 is coming soon. Thanks for checking and pointing that out! > Also, we currently have just rubygem-asciidoctor-1.5.6, > because it seems that 1.5.8 has never been built ... In any case, it's long out of date. :) My personal interest in asciidoctor is as a replacement for asciidoc with the git documentation. I've worked a little upstream with git and asciidoctor and submitted some PRs for the asciidoctor package. Recent work by a few other folks in the git project has greatly improved the results when using asciidoctor for git. -- Todd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx