On 9/10/19 4:28 PM, vvs vvs wrote:
But that's actually the same that I was trying to say. Meeting that activity statistics is the essence of such formal group. But grass-roots enthusiasts don't have such commitments. They can do some work occasionally if time allows but there is no strict agenda. This contradicts those expectations which you describe. So while there are people ready to do some work sometimes they just don't meet those criteria and this is not enough to be able to call them SIG.
And that's the whole problem here. Those people are not able to do enough work to keep i686 going. As has been said here many times, if you can get enough people to do the necessary work, then there is no need for the i686 repos to go away. But that just hasn't happened.
I don't think there are any requirement to create a SIG other than to have a group of people interested in the topic. The SIG still exists, but it isn't doing enough to be able to keep i686 alive.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
