Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* vvs vvs [10/09/2019 21:07] :
> 
> I suppose that SIG is a much formal entity than just a bunch of
> individuals performing some non-regular activities.

The PHP SIG is barely more than one person, the Perl SIG has no regular
meeting and the mailing list activity is not representative of the work
being done but thoses SIGS still do the work necessary to keep their
stack in the distribution.

> If that really was that simple then just subscribing to that list
> would be enough to get support for x86 architecture and we wouldn't
> be here.

I think you're confusing cause and effect, here.

We look at Bugzilla stats and mailing-lists activity because
it's (supposed to be) indicative of the work being done. It's a by-product,
not the final outcome. Subscribing to a mailing-list (and even posting
to it) isn't going to improve the packages in the distribution by itself.

Emmanuel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux