Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* vvs vvs [10/09/2019 11:41] :
>
> And the primary reason why that SIG initiative never worked is that the
> project didn't put any significant efforts to make that happen.

I'm going to disagree with you here.

Back in 2017, we went through a very long discussion which lead to the
creation of the x86 SIG. The discussion on the mailing list started off
at a reasonable rate and then slowed to a stop because it couldn't keep
its momentum going.

So the fault with the SIG not working really lies with the people who
wanted to keep x86_32 going not being able/willing to do the work necessary,
not all the other Fedora developers.

> Either we can be a low activity grass-roots enthusiasts and find our
> own ways to contribute packages, e.g. COPR might be useful.

This is pretty much the definition of a SIG.

Emmanuel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux