Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:18 PM Japheth Cleaver <cleaver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 8/29/2019 8:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 23:13 -0400, Christopher wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 8:56 PM John Harris <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> It might be okay to be a GNOME-specific thing, as that's the only spin of
> >>> Fedora which is affected by this decision.
> >>>
> >> The default firewall config affects every user of that edition, even
> >> if they never use GNOME (or even use graphical boot). So, I don't know
> >> if this would be adequate.
> > Why would you install Workstation if you didn't intend to use GNOME?
>
> That would seem to be a reasonable question, but if it's possible to do
> so then it is bound to happen... It may be a symptom of unclear definition.

Workstation is the primary product. Some choose that not for GNOME...
but because they want to start with the most base product and
customize from there. If you start with a Spin, you may get something
pre-configured in a very weird way... and with a smaller support
community.

In any case, what users do with the Workstation product isn't the
point at all. The point is that the problem at hand is the
firewalld.conf file, and *NOT* anything to do with the GNOME
experience itself, or any part of any GNOME packages.

>
> If Workstation is going to require a graphical environment for
> reasonable usage/administration/whatever, then it should be made
> mandatory somehow. It would also help clarify that the Workstation,

Yikes! Making a particular (graphical or otherwise) environment
mandatory is a frightening idea for a Linux distro. "Have it your way"
is what separates Linux from proprietary OSes.

> Server, and <null> Products must be treated distinctly... and that you
> shouldn't just point your kickstart file at whatever ISO you happen to
> have laying around.

Agreed, but nobody suggested that. Writing a kickstart specifically
for the Workstation product seems like a sane thing to do if you want
to PXE boot and automate a custom install based on Workstation for
your entire office / school / library that you support as an IT
person. And, to loop it back to the main point of this thread... if
you were to do that, unless you took special steps to clobber
firewalld.conf with your own, you'd be affected by the firewalld.conf
default configuration without ever logging in to GNOME on any of those
workstations. Again, the problem isn't GNOME... it's firewalld's
default configuration in Workstation.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux