On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 8:31:27 AM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: > On 8/20/19 10:32 AM, John Harris wrote: > > > On Monday, August 19, 2019 2:56:58 PM MST Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > > >> the right thing to do is to suspend on inactivity in all cases. > > > > I don't think it's fair for one person to decide what the "right thing to > > do" is. This kind of thinking is what leads to things like GNOME's awful > > defaults.> > > > > I was just answering someone who said that this never happens and is not > important. I didn't mean to sound like I am deciding anything---as you > say, demanding changes is only valid when one provides patches to > implement them. In this case they may be tricky: Windows didn't > implement them either, until recently. BTW, do you disagree on this > specific issue, or just make a general point that people should not pass > judgment on what's right or not? Considering an environment that I support would require this to be disabled (always show the prompt, while it's up), I would generally be against this change if it is not implemented as an option. Additionally, as this is being implement counter to the default behavior for the last decade, I would suggest that it be disabled by default, with an option for users to enable it if they would like. -- John M. Harris, Jr. <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Splentity https://splentity.com/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
