On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 5:35 PM Justin Forbes <jmforbes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:04 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Action summary > > ==================== > > > > Accepted blockers > > ----------------- > > 1. dracut-modules-olpc — Cannot be installed due to unsatisfied > > 'bitfrost' dependency — NEW > > ACTION: dracut-modules-olpc to resolve dependency on desired bitfrost package. > > > > Proposed blockers > > ----------------- > > 1. gnome-initial-setup — > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734198 — NEW > > ACTION: gnome-initiail-setup maintainers to fix crash when timedatex > > service is unavailable. > > > > 2. kernel — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733388 — NEW > > ACTION: QA team to determine if btrfs should be excluded from blocker > > criteria and perhaps propose dropping it from the installer > > > > 3. selinux-policy-targeted — > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734197 — POST > > ACTION: QA team to verify new build (3.14.4-31.fc31) fixes issue > > > > > > Bug-by-bug detail > > ============= > > > > Accepted blockers > > ----------------- > > 1. dracut-modules-olpc — Cannot be installed due to unsatisfied > > 'bitfrost' depndency — NEW > > Cannot be installed due to unsatisfied 'bitfrost' dependency > > > > bitfrost package was retired, which prevents dractu-modules-olpc from > > building. However there is some discussion as to whether it's > > reasonable for that package to be added to the > > Server DVD. Currently, "dracut*" is added to Server, Workstation, and > > Everything builds: > > https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/blob/master/f/fedora.conf#_130 > > > > Proposed blockers > > ----------------- > > 1. gnome-initial-setup — > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734198 — NEW > > g-i-s crashes if timedatex.service isn't running > > > > Crash caused by the SELinux denial in BZ 1734197. gnome-initial-setup > > should handle that failure case gracefully. Note that systemd > > maintainers are looking to obsolete timedatex: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735584 > > > > 2. kernel — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733388 — NEW > > Circular locking often causes btrfs installs to hang with > > kernel-5.3.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc31 and later > > > > Installations since kernel-5.3.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc31 often fail during > > package installation. The the QA team will consider excluding btrfs > > from any blocker criteria. The bug appears > > to be fixed upstream: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/35b5e6a8-8e9b-037d-b248-36fee9da8717@xxxxxxxx/ > > This patch is included in current F31/rawhide, so it should be fixed, > though I would still like the question of excluding btrfs from blocker > criteria to be evaluated. It was added when there was some discussion > of making btrfs the default many years ago. I do not see that > happening any more. > This is something I'm trying to work towards proposing again in the future. The state of affairs for Btrfs upstream is pretty good these days, but the lack of folks experienced kernel-side within Fedora has been something I've been trying to remedy before going down that road. I've discussed this with Davide Cavalca (CC'd to this email) and he's going to try to help me get some resources to help with improving the situation in Fedora. I'm hopeful this will make reviving that conversation in the near future a lot more tenable than it was for the past few years. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
