Re: Updating Rawhide vs GPG keys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 13. 03. 19 v 11:49 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):

Ok, so the process which worked for me was:


~~~

$ sudo dnf update https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedora-repos/30/0.5/data/signed/cfc659b9/noarch/fedora-{gpg-keys,repos{,-rawhide}}-30-0.5.noarch.rpm


$ sudo dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide fedora-gpg-keys --release 31

~~~


But what I really hate about is that after the first step, my system becomes F30. Yes, the other step changes it back to Rawhide, but in the meantime, all the repos I had disabled (such as rawhide-modular) are enabled again, because there is unnecessary fiddling with repositories.

I submitted https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-repos/pull-request/29, which would enable the process to simplify and avoid the issues with the repo files to either:


So this was merged (thx), but not released up until this point (:-[), so the struggle with updating Rawhide continues. But hopefully, this will be better with f32 branch.


Vít




~~~

$ sudo dnf update https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedora-repos/30/0.5/data/signed/cfc659b9/noarch/fedora-gpg-keys-30-0.5.noarch.rpm

~~~


or even to:


~~~

$ sudo dnf update --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=updates{,-testing} fedora-gpg-keys

~~~


I have not tested the latter.

I wish the PR was merged, because the strict relation between repos and gpg-keys serves no purpose IMO.


Vít



Dne 12. 03. 19 v 19:53 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On 3/12/19 4:14 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 11. 03. 19 v 19:29 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On 3/11/19 4:31 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,

Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
and not using --nogpgcheck?
Can you expand on the case here?

What should happen is:

* branching
* f30 repos gets the f31 key
They got the f31 key in -0.4, but the *signed* package with this key
without subsequent changes to the repositories done in -0.5 is not
available anywhere.
Thats due to compose issues. A compose completed last night so this
should be there now?

* you update your f30-repos
* you jump to rawhide and dnf just imports the key.

How did you get on rawhide?

It seems that Rawhide keys were added in fedora-repos-30-0.4. So this is
the package which is still "rawhide" package and has "f31" keys. But
this package was not probably signed, because this directory is empty:

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedora-repos/30/0.4/data/signed/
Yeah, no longer shipped packages have their signed packages removed
after a while to save space. You just want any newer one there.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedora-repos/30/0.5/data/signed/cfc659b9/
for example.
I did this try 30-0.5 of course, but this is wrong, since installing
this package makes F30 from my Rawhide, that is not what I want.

May the the whole problem is, that fedora-gpg-keys has to be updated
together with fedora-repos?
The problem is that we are calling rawhide two things and have seperate
config for it. Once we call it 'rawhide' instead of a number and use the
same config as other branches I think most of these problems will go away.

$ LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 sudo dnf update --disablerepo=rawhide
--enablerepo=updates-testing --release 30
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedora-repos/30/0.5/data/signed/cfc659b9/noarch/fedora-gpg-keys-30-0.5.noarch.rpm
Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:12 ago on Tue Mar 12 12:12:22 2019.
Dependencies resolved.

 Problem: cannot install both fedora-gpg-keys-30-0.5.noarch and
fedora-gpg-keys-30-0.2.noarch
  - package fedora-repos-30-0.2.noarch requires fedora-gpg-keys =
30-0.2, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package
fedora-gpg-keys-30-0.2.noarch
  - problem with installed package fedora-repos-30-0.2.noarch
==============================================================================================================================================================================================
 Package                                           
Architecture                             
Version                                  
Repository                                       Size
==============================================================================================================================================================================================
Skipping packages with conflicts:
(add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
 fedora-gpg-keys                                   
noarch                                   
30-0.5                                   
@commandline                                    102 k

Transaction Summary
==============================================================================================================================================================================================
Skip  1 Package

Nothing to do.
Complete!

~~~


Which is not what you expect?
Try again with --enablerepo=fedora ? You need the base repo not just
updates-testing?

kevin




_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux