On 3/11/19 4:31 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi, > > Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching > and not using --nogpgcheck? Can you expand on the case here? What should happen is: * branching * f30 repos gets the f31 key * you update your f30-repos * you jump to rawhide and dnf just imports the key. How did you get on rawhide? > It seems that Rawhide keys were added in fedora-repos-30-0.4. So this is > the package which is still "rawhide" package and has "f31" keys. But > this package was not probably signed, because this directory is empty: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedora-repos/30/0.4/data/signed/ Yeah, no longer shipped packages have their signed packages removed after a while to save space. You just want any newer one there. https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedora-repos/30/0.5/data/signed/cfc659b9/ for example. > Installing anything from Rawhide fails, because of missing GPG keys. > > So is there a way to get the GPG keys via DNF? Would it be possible to > sign fedora-repos and fedora-release packages by older key to allow > smooth updates? The f30 repos should already include the f31 key. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-repos/c/81ae6bcd584818d890f7939658884c5c9ec2e85c?branch=f30 You can also get it from there: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-repos/raw/f30/f/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-31-primary kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
