Re: Missing arches on EPEL 8 for LibRaw?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> One of the problems with the above plan was that koji decides whats
> artifacts it will pull into its build root with a sort of hierarchy of
> 'if I built it use it even if an external repo has a higher NVR'.
> There are ways to get around that but they are meant to be temporary
> and this would need to make them 'permanent'. Again not impossible but
> it would take a lot of engineering time that would have to be balanced
> against all the other projects we have been asked to complete.

Would it work to just give the epel-limitedarch repo lower priority than 
upstream RHEL in Koji? Or would it then try to use the RHEL builds across 
all architectures and fail to find builds for the missing ones?

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux