The coverage dependency was removed (F31 and Rawhide): https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/2086 The main reason for the removal was that this wasn't really used in the past and the recent Anaconda changes needs other solution to get the correct coverage. Jirka On Wed, 2019-08-14 at 11:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2019-08-14 at 11:29 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 08:44:24PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > What is the point of this? I am probably missing something > > > obvious.. > > > > I think this was because getting good coverage data from anaconda > > without actually booting the installer iso wasn't possible. > > atodorov may > > be able to provide more context. > > was this possibly to do with the kickstart-tests effort - an attempt > to > figure out the code coverage of those tests? > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . > net > http://www.happyassassin.net > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
