Re: Including OO templates in fc4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

> A lot of people distrust autopackage because by
> letting every random
> project release its binaries the way it wants it
> sidesteps the sanity
> and consistency checks a real distro does.

not true since not a lot of people dont use
autopackage at all yet. if you mean they distrust the
distributed model of letting upstream developers
release the binaries themselves instead of relying on
the centralised and distro redundant centralised
repository model then they dont the usefulness of a
distro neutral packaging method. besides autopackage
has planned rpm integration for a future version. you
should take any valid complaints to the developers
themselves and give them a chance to explain the
logic.


> 
> So yes by all means do provide autopackages too.
> Just don't expect them
> to supersede all the rest.

no need to play the popularity game here

Regards
Rahul Sundaram


	
		
__________________________________ 
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web 
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux