On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:31 PM Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> The real question which every packager should ask himself is: Do I have
> the capacity (time, knowledge, hardware, etc.) to solve problems on
> non-supported architecture by upstream?
> And if the answer is no - it is probably better to drop the arch instead
> of shipping smth that not even the maintainer knows whether it is usable
> at all (like I used to ship eclipse on 32 bit arm although I'm quite sure
> it was not usable at all).
By that definition, all my packages would really be ExclusiveArch: x86_64.
Is that really what you want?
There is big difference between what I want and what I can do :) . Setting clear expectations is crucial for any system to work properly and issues(e.g. understaffed) being noticed before it's late.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
